Netflix says it shouldn害羞草研究所檛 be forced to pay into funds that are designed to support the creation of Canadian content, arguing that the country is better served by market competition than by regulating foreign online services.

The California-based company makes the argument in a submission to a government-appointed expert panel that will make recommendations for changing Canada害羞草研究所檚 laws governing broadcasting and telecommunications.

害羞草研究所淣umerous online distributors offer an abundance of content, including Canadian content, on demand, anywhere and any time to anyone with access to the open internet,害羞草研究所� the Netflix submission says.

害羞草研究所淲e do not subscribe to the theory that a 害羞草研究所渞egulated investment害羞草研究所� is more valuable than a consumer and market-driven one.害羞草研究所�

RELATED:

The 30-page submission, made public Friday, says Netflix is on track to 害羞草研究所渟ignificantly exceed害羞草研究所� a $500-million commitment to fund original content made in Canada under a five-year agreement announced in 2017.

The paper, dated Jan. 11, is one of many submissions to the expert panel, which is expected to complete its review by Jan. 31, 2020 害羞草研究所� after the next federal election in October.

Although the panel hasn害羞草研究所檛 made the full collection of submissions public, some groups have released theirs 害羞草研究所� often in support of positions that have been made in previous public debates.

Stephane Cardin, Netflix director of public policy, said Friday that the company decided to release its position paper ahead the 2019 Prime Time conference next week, when it will be on a panel with groups that had disclosed their positions.

Netflix argues that foreign online services such as itself would face unfair discrimination if it害羞草研究所檚 forced by law to pay into the Canadian Media Fund, which it says currently denies it the same rights as Canadian-owned broadcasters and distribution companies.

害羞草研究所淔or certified CanCon, the Canadian broadcaster obtains 害羞草研究所渇irst-window害羞草研究所� rights in Canada while Netflix, or another online service, gets international rights outside Canada and possibly second-window rights in Canada,害羞草研究所� it says.

If foreign online services are required to contribute to the CMF without getting 害羞草研究所渇irst window害羞草研究所� rights in Canada, Neflix says, it would be discriminatory.

害羞草研究所淚t would also effectively force foreign online services to subsidize Canadian broadcasters, and reinforce the market power of vertically-integrated incumbents.害羞草研究所�

Alternatively, it says, if foreign services had equal access to the CMF 害羞草研究所渢hey would be drawn into competing with Canadian broadcasters or VOD services for the Canadian first window rights for publicly funded original Canadian content.害羞草研究所�

When asked by The Canadian Press whether Netflix was calling for an end to the Canadian Media Fund, where Cardin was a vice-president for 12 years, he was unequivocal.

害羞草研究所淎bsolutely not,害羞草研究所� he said. 害羞草研究所淲e do not say that, nor do we advocate for it.害羞草研究所�

Netflix noted that it faces increased competition from other foreign and Canadian video-on-demand services, including Bell Media害羞草研究所檚 Crave subscription service, and the newer ad-supported CTV Movies and CTV Throwback.

The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, which receives funding from the federal government and advertisers, has also launched its new Gem online service to provide live and on-demand programming.

Netflix said it害羞草研究所檚 not trying to get special treatment under Canadian tax laws, and noted it will begin collecting and remitting a Quebec sales tax in January 2019.

害羞草研究所淲e will comply with tax laws if and when they legally are extended to services like Netflix,害羞草研究所� it says.

Like us on and follow us on .