害羞草研究所

Skip to content

Landmark 害羞草研究所榝air comment害羞草研究所 case settled between B.C. school trustee and former union president

Glen Hansman害羞草研究所檚 application to have Neufeld defamation case thrown out granted by B.C. judge
19564142_web1_GlenHansmanBarryNeufeld
Chilliwack school trustee Barry Neufeld (left) and former BCTF president Glen Hansman (right).

A defamation lawsuit against the former president of the BC teachers害羞草研究所 union by a Chilliwack school trustee has been dismissed before it even got to trial.

Trustee Barry Neufeld had filed a defamation suit against Glen Hansman, who at the time was the president of the B.C. Teachers害羞草研究所 Federation. He launched the suit in October 2018 after Hansman responded in the media to Neufeld害羞草研究所檚 statements on the controversial SOGI 123.

In response, Hansman filed his own suit through the Protection of Public Participation Act (PPPA), claiming Neufeld is a public figure and was open to being criticized without threat of defamation. That was heard in July 2o19, and a court date for the defamation suit was tentatively set for this December.

But that case won害羞草研究所檛 be happening now.

Justice A. Ross on Wednesday, saying that his decision has 害羞草研究所渘othing to do with 害羞草研究所榗orrectness害羞草研究所 of either party害羞草研究所檚 position on that issue (SOGI 123).害羞草研究所

He noted the intent of the PPPA legislation is 害羞草研究所渢o screen out actions that have the effect of limiting a defendant害羞草研究所檚 participation in public debate. In that respect, the PPPA seeks to balance the rights of individuals to protect their reputations against the obvious benefit to a democratic society of protecting free speech and rigorous debate on issues of public interest.害羞草研究所

Hansman argued that he had every right to speak out against Neufeld害羞草研究所檚 comments, which he said harmed him and the LGBTQ community. Hansman is openly gay. Neufeld said that Hansman害羞草研究所檚 comments were made in malice, and harmed him as well.

Neufeld did not prove to the court, the judge stated, that substantial damage had been done to his reputation. He called Neufeld害羞草研究所檚 evidence 害羞草研究所渟keletal at best.害羞草研究所 Neufeld did also win a following election and remains on the Chilliwack school board.

Furthermore, one of the most controversial statements made by Neufeld were on a Facebook post in which he concedes he was posting 害羞草研究所渁t the risk of being labelled a bigotted homophobe.害羞草研究所

Some of the things Hansman said about Neufeld in the time of the SOGI 123 debates included calling him transphobic, saying he should be removed from public office, and nowhere near students.

But in the end, Ross sided with Hansman害羞草研究所檚 argument for public debate.

害羞草研究所淚 have further found that the PPPA requires me to balance the seriousness of the harm suffered by the plaintiff (Neufeld) and the public interest in continuing the proceeding against the public interest in protecting the defendant害羞草研究所檚 (Hansman) expression. The plaintiff has an interest in claiming damages and clearing his good name. However, the public has an interest in protecting expressions that relate to public debate. In balancing those interests, I find that the interest in public debate outweighs the interest in continuing the proceeding on these facts.害羞草研究所

Ross害羞草研究所檚 decision now means that Neufeld害羞草研究所檚 defamation case will not go through. This was reportedly the first time the so called 害羞草研究所渁nti-SLAPP害羞草研究所 legislation has been tested in court.

Story is developing. More to come.

READ MORE:



jpeters@theprogress.com

Like us on and follow us on .



Jessica Peters

About the Author: Jessica Peters

I began my career in 1999, covering communities across the Fraser Valley ever since.
Read more



(or

害羞草研究所

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }