The Liberal government has finalized all of its deals with municipalities under the housing accelerator fund, a program it says has triggered Canada害羞草研究所檚 biggest-ever movement to increase residential density.
Housing Minister Sean Fraser announced Monday the federal government has signed 179 housing deals via the $4-billion housing accelerator fund.
The program has 害羞草研究所渓ed to the largest up-zoning movement in Canadian history,害羞草研究所� a government news release said.
Ottawa says the competitive process for funding resulted in 544 applications, but only one-third of them were successful.
The agreements, which run until 2026-27, are expected to help fast-track 107,000 permits within the next three years and build more than 750,000 homes over the next ten years.
害羞草研究所淲e害羞草研究所檝e allowed communities to advance local solutions in exchange for federal investments,害羞草研究所� said Fraser in an interview with The Canadian Press.
The Liberal government has raced to sign housing deals with cities since it launched the program in June. That energy coincided with a significant drop in support for the Liberals in polling as Canadians became increasingly angry with the government over the cost of living.
Experts often point out Canada害羞草研究所檚 housing shortage is caused in part by excessive red tape, slow permitting processes and high development fees at the municipal level.
According to the Canadian Home Builders害羞草研究所� Association, average municipal approval timelines for housing projects in 2022 spanned from three months to nearly three years, depending on the city.
The housing accelerator fund has been touted by the Liberals as the solution to these problems. It offered communities federal dollars in exchange for changes to bylaws and regulations that would boost home construction.
Although the specifics of the agreements vary, Fraser says he害羞草研究所檚 managed to secure significant changes from cities, including the digitalization of the permitting process and an end to exclusionary housing, or zoning that limits what you can develop on specific land.
Under the agreements the federal government, municipalities receive 25 per cent of their funds upon signing and 25 per cent each year thereafter, provided they reach specified milestones.
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has also suggested that the solution to the housing crisis requires the federal government to push cities to be more development-friendly.
Poilievre害羞草研究所檚 signature proposal, which was outlined in a private members害羞草研究所� bill in September, requires cities to increase home building by 15 per cent each year to receive their usual infrastructure spending.
The Conservative proposal would reallocate $100 million from the housing accelerator fund to give additional money to communities that greatly exceed the housing targets.
Cities that fail to meet that target would see a decrease in the federal dollars they receive, while those that exceed it would get additional money.
Meanwhile, the Conservative leader blasted the Liberals害羞草研究所� $4-billion fund, saying it funnels money to the same 害羞草研究所済atekeepers害羞草研究所� who are contributing to the bottleneck.
A spokesman for Poilievre wouldn害羞草研究所檛 say whether the Conservatives would scrap the housing accelerator fund if they were to form government.
害羞草研究所淐ommon sense Conservatives will reward those who get homes built and punish gatekeepers that block home building. By contrast, Trudeau害羞草研究所檚 so called 害羞草研究所榟ousing accelerator fund害羞草研究所� has done nothing to fix the issue he害羞草研究所檚 created after eight years in power,害羞草研究所� said Sebastian Skamski in a statement.
When asked about the criticism, Fraser fired back at Poilievre害羞草研究所檚 housing plan, calling it 害羞草研究所渄oomed to fail.害羞草研究所�
Frasier said 害羞草研究所渨hoever害羞草研究所� designed the Conservative plan 害羞草研究所渕ust have spent no more than five minutes thinking about housing policy.害羞草研究所�
The minister said the pool of money Poilievre would dole out in bonuses is too small and the 15-per-cent rule could lead to 害羞草研究所減erverse incentives.害羞草研究所�
That害羞草研究所檚 because a city that experienced little population growth could potentially put less effort to boost housing than a neighboring community, but still receive more funding.
READ ALSO:
READ ALSO:
