The time, money and effort Iain Burns put into growing an audience on Facebook for several local news outlets in British Columbia felt like it disappeared in a single day.

Facebook pages for Now Media Group, which publishes news in B.C.害羞草研究所檚 Okanagan Valley, have since gone dark.

Last August, Meta removed news on its Facebook and Instagram platforms for Canadian users in response to the Liberal government害羞草研究所檚 Online News Act.

As the managing editor with Now Media Group, Burns watched as his audience 害羞草研究所� and revenue 害羞草研究所� dropped because of it.

害羞草研究所淲e lost 70 per cent of our audience when that happened,害羞草研究所� along with 50 per cent of revenue, said Burns in an interview from Kelowna, B.C.

The company used Facebook to get clicks on its news stories, which in return brought in ad revenue for those views.

害羞草研究所淲e害羞草研究所檙e not the only ones. Many, many outlets are in this situation.害羞草研究所�

A recent paper by the Media Ecosystem Observatory 害羞草研究所� a collaboration between McGill University and the University of Toronto 害羞草研究所� offers an initial glimpse into the effect of the Meta news ban.

National news outlets lost about 64 per cent of the engagement previously generated by users on their Facebook pages, the preliminary research shows.

Local news outlets lost about 85 per cent of their Facebook engagement, the study says, and almost half of all local news outlets stopped posting on Facebook entirely in the four months following the ban.

Some outlets 害羞草研究所渉ave gone dark entirely because they害羞草研究所檙e no longer getting the ad revenue being driven from Facebook to their sites,害羞草研究所� said Aengus Bridgman, who directs the Media Ecosystem Observatory.

害羞草研究所淎nd so this is hugely consequential for both Canadians and for news outlets.害羞草研究所�

Some outlets were able to maintain engagement on their Facebook pages because their news is still viewable outside Canada, and they have maintained an international audience.

While news outlets suffered, Meta itself was seemingly unaffected.

害羞草研究所淥ne of the remarkable things we saw was the overall behaviour on the platform didn害羞草研究所檛 decrease,害羞草研究所� said Bridgman.

害羞草研究所淲e didn害羞草研究所檛 see Canadians saying, 害羞草研究所極h, I no longer use Facebook, I no longer use Instagram.害羞草研究所� It doesn害羞草研究所檛 seem there害羞草研究所檚 been sort of an exodus from the platform in any meaningful way.害羞草研究所�

The researchers found 33 per cent of Canadians still used Facebook or Instagram to get news about politics and current events several times a month, even though they couldn害羞草研究所檛 see content from news outlets on either platform.

For the study, researchers collected Facebook data between June and December of 2023, tracking engagement before and after the ban.

They analyzed the Facebook pages of 987 Canadian news outlets, 183 politicians, commentators and advocacy groups, as well as 589 political and local community groups.

They saw a similar volume of posting within political discussion groups but instead of links to news articles, people posted screenshots of them, Bridgman said.

That means readers are seeing the content, but outlets aren害羞草研究所檛 seeing the revenue.

害羞草研究所淭his study is pretty depressing, I think, from a public good perspective,害羞草研究所� he said.

The preliminary findings haven害羞草研究所檛 yet been peer reviewed, but The Media Ecosystem Observatory plans to release a report in the summer.

READ ALSO:

Burns said some Facebook users have posted screenshots of his original content to their feeds or local community groups.

害羞草研究所淭he sad thing is politicians do it too,害羞草研究所� Burns said

He害羞草研究所檚 also seen fake news stories masquerading as screenshots of national publications.

害羞草研究所淛ust from a reach point of view, it is very sad to spend hours and hours on a really good story, a proper good exclusive, and publish it, and then see it gets maybe 20 per cent of the reach it would have got before August 2023,害羞草研究所� Burns said.

The decision by Meta to remove news has created one of the largest disruptions to Canada害羞草研究所檚 information ecosystem in recent years, the study says.

Meta resisted the measures in the Liberal government害羞草研究所檚 Online News Act from the beginning, arguing that it was based on a 害羞草研究所渇undamentally flawed premise.害羞草研究所�

The law required Meta and Google to enter into negotiation with news publishers for licensing agreements to their content.

In response, Meta removed news links from its platform and Google was granted an exemption to the law by agreeing to pay Canadian news outlets $100 million a year.

Burns said he doesn害羞草研究所檛 qualify for any of that money because his newsroom hasn害羞草研究所檛 been designated as a qualified Canadian journalism organization under the Income Tax Act 害羞草研究所� a decision he said he害羞草研究所檚 tried to have reversed.

It was denied that designation on grounds it doesn害羞草研究所檛 produce original content, he said, despite reporting on local council meetings, provincial politics and, recently, a news conference by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

A reporter for one of his outlets posed a question to the prime minister about Meta that garnered national news coverage 害羞草研究所� something Burns said he found 害羞草研究所渋ronic.害羞草研究所�

In response to the question about whether his government would compromise with Meta so that people in B.C. could access news links about wildfire season, Trudeau said the web giant is 害羞草研究所渋rresponsible害羞草研究所� and promised not to 害羞草研究所渂ow down to them.害羞草研究所�

With a loss of revenue and no access to the Google money, Burns said his team is trying to shift more video coverage to grow its audience back.

Facebook 害羞草研究所渒ind of showed who害羞草研究所檚 boss, really, didn害羞草研究所檛 they?害羞草研究所� Burns said. 害羞草研究所淭hey showed they were the stronger party and I think that was a real lesson here.害羞草研究所�

Mickey Djuric, The Canadian Press