Trinity Western University害羞草研究所檚 community covenant is no longer mandatory for students.
The Langley-based university has decided to change its requirements surrounding a controversial covenant that forbids sexual intimacy outside of marriage, which is defined as between a man and a woman.
The covenant, which all students, staff and faculty at TWU, a private Christian university, were expected to sign, will become optional for students, but will still apply to staff and faculty.
A issued Tuesday by TWU President Bob Kuhn said the decision was made by the university board of governors on Thursday, Aug. 9.
害羞草研究所淚n a decision that I believe will successfully position us to better fulfill the TWU Mission, the Board of Governors has passed the following motion: 害羞草研究所業n furtherance of our desire to maintain TWU as a thriving community of Christian believers that is inclusive of all students wishing to learn from a Christian viewpoint and underlying philosophy, the Community Covenant will no longer be mandatory as of the 2018-19 Academic year with respect to admission of students to, or continuation of students at, the University.害羞草研究所櫤π卟菅芯克鶟
Kuhn said the university will 害羞草研究所渁ctively work to determine ways in which our Christian identity, mission and ministry can continue to be strengthened, communicated and better lived-out in the context of the TWU community while simultaneously welcoming and affirming the unique value of each member of our diverse student body.害羞草研究所�
害羞草研究所淟et there be no confusion regarding the Board of Governors害羞草研究所� resolution; our mission remains the same,害羞草研究所� Kuhn added.
The announcement drew a positive, but cautious response from Kasari Govender the executive director of West Coast Women害羞草研究所檚 Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF), one of the groups that went to court to argue against approving the law school while the covenant was in effect.
害羞草研究所淚t害羞草研究所檚 a step in the right direction,害羞草研究所� said Govender.
害羞草研究所淚 certainly think it害羞草研究所檚 a positive step (but) it害羞草研究所檚 not sufficient to alleviate our concerns about discrimination.害羞草研究所�
West Coast LEAF intervened in the BC case at all levels of court to argue that the covenant discriminates against people who choose to exercise their reproductive rights and discriminates on the basis of 害羞草研究所渟exual orientation and marital status by prohibiting all relationships that are not heterosexual and between married people.害羞草研究所�
Govender said there are 害羞草研究所渃onstitutional issues害羞草研究所� that would have to be considered before a law school would be considered acceptable, including the fact that the covenant is still mandatory for faculty and staff.
害羞草研究所淒oes it really mean this is a law school that won害羞草研究所檛 be exclusionary?害羞草研究所� Govender said.
Several law societies have said they would not recognize degrees issued by a proposed school of law at Trinity because of the covenant.
The law school was granted preliminary approval by the provincial government in 2013, but that approval was later withdrawn because of the various legal challenges mounted by critics in the legal community, who complained the clause was anti-gay and would violate a lawyer害羞草研究所檚 duty to represent all clients.
In June, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the right of two Canadian Law Societies to refuse accreditation for a proposed law school at Trinity Western University.
Both the Law Societies of B.C. and Ontario objected to the community covenant, arguing it discriminates against LGBTQ students.
The LSBC initially approved the law school at the private Christian university in Langley, but later withdrew that approval because of controversy over the covenant.
害羞草研究所淭here can be no question that the LSBC was entitled to consider an inequitable admissions policy in determining whether to approve the proposed law school. Its mandate is broad,害羞草研究所� thestated.
害羞草研究所淚n promoting the public interest in the administration of justice and, relatedly, public confidence in the legal profession, the LSBC was entitled to consider an admissions policy that imposes inequitable and harmful barriers to entry.害羞草研究所�
The court ruled that the LSBC decision 害羞草研究所渄id not limit religious freedom to a significant extent害羞草研究所π卟菅芯克鶟
While Canadian law protects the rights of people to hold personal religious beliefs, that right has to be balanced against the effect they have on other people, the court found.
害羞草研究所淚n this case, the effect of the mandatory covenant is to restrict the conduct of others. The LSBC害羞草研究所檚 decision prevents the risk of significant harm to LGBTQ people who feel they have no choice but to attend TWU害羞草研究所檚 proposed law school. These individuals would have to deny who they are for three years to receive a legal education. Being required by someone else害羞草研究所檚 religious beliefs to behave contrary to one害羞草研究所檚 sexual identity is degrading and disrespectful.害羞草研究所�
During the legal battle, Kuhn noted the TWU covenant also says that 害羞草研究所渁ll students and faculty are to love and respect other people, regardless of their background or personal characteristics. TWU is a community of diversity and acceptance. This campus is a Christian home for four thousand students with an array of opinions and beliefs.害羞草研究所�
Tag
