The lawyer representing B.C. churches that have continued to hold services in violation of health orders said that the rules were over-broad, arbitrary, and disproportionate in a hearing Monday in B.C. Supreme Court.
A lawyer for the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms is representing a group of churches and individuals, claiming that some of B.C.害羞草研究所檚 public health orders barring many gatherings are unconstitutional.
害羞草研究所淲ho are you saying is being discriminated against?害羞草研究所� B.C. Chief Justice Christopher Hinkson asked as lawyer Paul Jaffe argued.
Jaffe replied that churches are subject to a different standard than other, secular gatherings. Later in the proceedings, he explicitly said that retail stores, schools, and pubs are allowed to have people in them but the moment a gathering becomes worship, it害羞草研究所檚 suddenly more dangerous.
害羞草研究所淚t害羞草研究所檚 entirely arbitrary,害羞草研究所� Jaffe argued.
But Hinkson pushed back on some of Jaffe害羞草研究所檚 arguments later in the morning, asking whether the courts were equipped to rule on Dr. Bonnie Henry害羞草研究所檚 expertise as the province害羞草研究所檚 chief medical health officer.
害羞草研究所淪he recognizes the Charter must be applied,害羞草研究所� Hinkson said. 害羞草研究所淪he says, bearing that in mind, I think from a public health interest, only certain things can happen. Now, what害羞草研究所檚 wrong with that from a correctness standard?害羞草研究所�
Jaffe continued to argue that there was an arbitrariness between the way the health orders were being applied to religious and secular gatherings.
害羞草研究所淲hat business does this court have telling Dr. Henry how to make decisions about public health?害羞草研究所� Hinkson asked.
The judge also noted that the change in policy in November that shut down in-person church services was not an 害羞草研究所渙n-off switch.害羞草研究所�
Churches can still hold virtual meetings, Hinkson noted, just as the court hearing was being held virtually.
He also questioned Jaffe about the lack of evidence of transmission of the virus in churches.
害羞草研究所淚f the churches have not been operating, the vast majority of them, how could there be evidence their operation is creating problems?害羞草研究所� Hinkson said.
The churches can show there was minimal risk before the November shutdown, Jaffe said.
Also involved in the petition are a few people who were ticketed for holding outdoor protests in B.C., although the rules have now been changed to accommodate outdoor protests.
Jaffe and lawyers representing the B.C. Attorney General and Henry have already clashed in front of Hinkson, when in March the government sought an injunction to block or even arrest people from attending the services.
Hinkson rejected the government害羞草研究所檚 request, saying the health authorities and police had enforcement powers they hadn害羞草研究所檛 even used yet, and therefore the courts had no need to issue an injunction.
So far, police have issued tickets but prosecutors have not announced more serious charges against the churches.
READ MORE:
Last week, the government offered a limited in-person outdoor attendance option to the churches, but Jaffe said it didn害羞草研究所檛 go far enough.
It would allow outdoor services of no more than 25 members, with no singing, mandatory masks and no socializing after services, something Jaffe said was less than the churches were allowed during a brief period during the pandemic when in-person worship was allowed.
READ MORE:
- More to come
