Fourteen years after an innocent couple was murdered outside of Cranbrook, family and relatives are still yearning for justice.

On May 29, 2010, Leanne MacFarlane and Jeffrey Todd Taylor were killed in a rural residence east of Cranbrook in a horrific case of mistaken identity, as authorities theorized the same home害羞草研究所檚 previous occupant 害羞草研究所� a man with alleged gang ties 害羞草研究所� was the intended target.

MacFarlane and Taylor were engaged and had just moved to Cranbrook from Salmon Arm, as they were in the process of opening up a cellphone store with a life of promise and opportunity ahead of them.

害羞草研究所淪he was such a special soul,害羞草研究所� said Wendy Holland, MacFarlane害羞草研究所檚 sister. 害羞草研究所淪he always found something good in everyone and everything. She had such a great love for animals and never lived without them and her main love was dogs and horses. There are so many special and funny stories of her growing up and things that she did. She had such a great sense of humour and zest for life.害羞草研究所�

Taylor was a man who 害羞草研究所渓oved my sister and her kids immensely,害羞草研究所� said Holland.

Eight years passed before arrests were made in the case.

Colin Correia and Sheldon Hunter were charged with murder in 2018, however, they were acquitted after a lengthy 150-day trial that took over three years to prosecute due to pandemic-related delays.

In a Vancouver courtroom on April 25, 2022, Justice Silverman delivered a not guilty verdict based on three factors.

According to Silverman害羞草研究所檚 ruling, evidence established that the intended victim did not live at the home at the time and further, there was reasonable doubt whether the two accused knew that the intended target did not live at the residence and hadn害羞草研究所檛 for months.

Secondly, the credibility of a key witness was 害羞草研究所渟uspect,害羞草研究所� while thirdly, cellphone and alibi evidence raised reasonable doubt that Hunter could have been in a different location at the time.

害羞草研究所淚 am not satisfied that the two accused persons are innocent,害羞草研究所� wrote Silverman, in his decision. 害羞草研究所淗owever, I am also not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that they are guilty.害羞草研究所�

Crown signalled an intent to appeal, filing notice a month after the decision and an amended notice last summer. Crown lawyers made submissions to the Court of Appeal over two days in March, with a decision yet to come.

If the Crown appeal is successful, a new trial could be ordered.

On the grounds for appeal, the Crown argues that the trial judge erred in law by excluding as involuntary statements that the defendant had made to police. The Crown also submits that the trial judge erred by excluding law enforcement evidence regarding measurements taken of the defendant害羞草研究所檚 shoes.

A B.C. Prosecution Service spokesperson confirmed the Crown害羞草研究所檚 appeal applies only to Correia, and that the appeal of Hunter害羞草研究所檚 acquittal was abandoned.