Police watchdog clears Mountie in 2020 chaotic Lake Country traffic stop

After criminal court proceedings, B.C.害羞草研究所檚 police watchdog has determined for a second time that a RCMP officer did not commit any offense during an incident that occurred in Lake Country in 2020.

The Independent Investigations Office (IIO) of B.C. originally put out its report on the matter on March 23, 2021 stating the officer didn害羞草研究所檛 commit an offence but after court proceedings, it has been confirmed again because of insufficient evidence.

In the IIO害羞草研究所檚 newest report, the parties involved are not named. The names are public record from a civil claim filed to B.C. Supreme Court on Sept. 24, 2020.

The incident under investigation by the IIO took place on Sept. 11, 2020, on Highway 97 near Lodge Road. Dustin Blondin was arrested for speeding after being caught travelling 120 km/h in a 70 km/h zone, Const. Julius Prommer. During the arrest, an altercation took place and Blondin claimed Prommer used unreasonable force and broke Blondin害羞草研究所檚 arm.

Prommer told investigators that Blondin害羞草研究所檚 reaction to being pulled over and being told his car could be impounded was 害羞草研究所渁ngry, belligerent, and objective.害羞草研究所� He also stated that Blondin was videoing himself 害羞草研究所渨hile pushing his face into [Prommer害羞草研究所檚] flashlight and yelling 害羞草研究所榶ou assaulted me害羞草研究所�.害羞草研究所�

Prommer also claimed that besides when Blondin pushed himself into the flashlight, there was no other physical contact until another officer arrived.

Prommer denied squeezing Blondin害羞草研究所檚 hand but did acknowledge that he had to restrain him in the backseat of his police vehicle by 害羞草研究所渃ontrolling his shoulders and rolling him害羞草研究所� to search Blondin and seize his cell phone.

After the event, Blondin was diagnosed with a spiral fracture in his left hand, which required surgery.

Blondin did acknowledge he was driving too fast at the time of the incident but upon meeting Prommer, stated he could tell he was 害羞草研究所渘ot in a good mood that day.害羞草研究所�

When Prommer asked for Blondin害羞草研究所檚 driver害羞草研究所檚 license, Blondin said his driver害羞草研究所檚 license was stolen, which IIO investigated and discovered to be true.

During the arrest, Blondin admitted to resisting being taken to the ground but Prommer 害羞草研究所渇lipped out害羞草研究所� and grabbed Blondin害羞草研究所檚 cuffed hands.

While being transported to the RCMP detachment, Blondin, while handcuffed, used his smartwatch to call 911. In the phone call, Blondin claims his hand was broken and his face was 害羞草研究所渟mashed on the pavement.害羞草研究所�

At the detachment, after being fingerprinted, he was given his phone back and spoke to a legal aid lawyer, who didn害羞草研究所檛 take his case.

During the investigation, Blondin provided officers with the video up to when Prommer told Blondin to stop shining his cell phone. Blondin didn害羞草研究所檛 provide a video of a flashlight hitting him in the eye, as he claimed.

A tow truck driver who arrived at the scene to take Blondin害羞草研究所檚 vehicle told investigators he saw Blondin 害羞草研究所渢rying to obstruct害羞草研究所� the officers at the scene. The tow truck driver looked away from the scene and when he looked back, Blondin was on the ground being handcuffed. He confirmed Blondin was yelling and screaming and stating the officer broke his arm.

Following this second investigation by the IIO, it was again determined there was insufficient evidence to say the force used was unreasonable.

It was concluded there was no problem with the original offence as Blondin was speeding significantly.

Chief civilian director Ronald J MacDonald stated that the inconsistencies in the evidence are the fact that the injury to Blondin害羞草研究所檚 hand is a spiral fracture, 害羞草研究所渕ore likely the result of a twisting force than a crushing one.害羞草研究所�

MacDonald found there was significant evidence from the second arriving officer to conclude the injury was most likely caused by the struggle to get Blondin害羞草研究所檚 arms under control and into restraints during the arrest.

害羞草研究所淚t might have been the indirect result of the efforts of either of the two officers but in any event does not appear to have been caused by any unjustified or excessive use of force, in the circumstance,害羞草研究所� he said.

MacDonald added that he did not consider there to be reasonable grounds to believe an officer committed an office under any enactment and therefore the matter would not be referred to the Crown Council for consideration of charges.

害羞草研究所淭he bottom line is that [Blondin]害羞草研究所檚 evidence suffers from reliability issues, and contradicts other known evidence,害羞草研究所� said MacDonald. 害羞草研究所淲hile the evidence from Prommer is incomplete when considering the totality of the matter, there is insufficient evidence to say that force used was unreasonable.害羞草研究所�

害羞草研究所