害羞草研究所

Skip to content

Developer to challenge action after Kelowna council pulls contentious permit

害羞草研究所榃e害羞草研究所檒l use the tools available to us to challenge this action害羞草研究所
33596594_web1_230814-KCN-35-doyle-pulled-council_1
Kelowna council has rescinded the development permit for a 25-storey tower planned for 350 Doyle Ave. (Gary Barnes/Capital News)

At its Aug. 14 regular meeting, Kelowna council pulled the development permit for a 25-storey tower planned for 350 Doyle Avenue, the site of the old RCMP detachment.

After a staff report outlining concerns that several speakers at a public hearing on the project were paid a per diem for their appearance, council voted unanimously to rescind the permit.

害羞草研究所淭wo of the players (council and the public) were unaware payments were made,害羞草研究所 said Stephen Flemming, city clerk. 害羞草研究所淭he rules of the game were tilted in a way that two of the three parties were not aware.害羞草研究所

READ MORE: Dollars given to supporters of Doyle development at Kelowna public hearing

Council included in its decision an invitation to the developer, Appelt Properties, to reapply for a permit.

CEO Greg Appelt attended the meeting remotely.

害羞草研究所淭his has been a profoundly disappointing turn of events,害羞草研究所 said Appelt. 害羞草研究所淚t has taken considerable work and dollars to bring this project to the development permit stage.害羞草研究所

Appelt noted that his company has been transparent and has not hidden the per diem issue.

害羞草研究所淲e have not broken any rules or laws. Can we really pretend that students, who were paid a per diem, tainted this process?害羞草研究所

Appelt also said that well-funded opposition to the development was well represented at the public hearing, and cautioned council about rescinding the development permit.

害羞草研究所淲e害羞草研究所檒l use the tools available to us to challenge this action,害羞草研究所 he added.

At the end of his comment Appelt said he would not take any questions from council.

Mayor Tom Dyas also spoke to reporters after the meeting.

害羞草研究所淚 can say that the information we released, outlining why we had the hearing and what staff had completed today and the communications back and forth between Appelt Properties, are kind of the guiding principles of why that motion was brought forward today. The view I think we took was one that we were concerned that it was a tainted process and that害羞草研究所檚 what we voted on.害羞草研究所



gary.barnes@kelownacapnews.com

Like us on and follow us on and subscribe to our daily newsletter.



Gary Barnes

About the Author: Gary Barnes

Journalist and broadcaster for three decades.
Read more



(or

害羞草研究所

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }