A Surrey Pretrial centre inmate backed by the West Coast Prison Justice Society is challenging the provincial government害羞草研究所檚 use of the balance of probabilities standard of proof in prison disciplinary hearings on grounds it violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Christopher Trotchie and the not-for-profit society maintain the government should require proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

Justice Karen Douglas rendered her on Oct. 27, in B.C. Supreme Court in Vancouver. She denied the government害羞草研究所檚 application to strike the challenge, having found the plaintiffs害羞草研究所� case is not destined to fail and should proceed to trial.

害羞草研究所淭his action does not challenge the Act or the Regulation. Rather, it challenges administrative decision makers害羞草研究所� use of the balance of probabilities standard of proof at prison inmate disciplinary hearings.害羞草研究所�

At issue, Douglas noted, is whether using the balance of probabilities standard in prison disciplinary hearings deprives inmates of 害羞草研究所渢heir liberty and security of the person in a manner that is contrary to the presumption of innocence.害羞草研究所�

For its part, the provincial government submitted that using the balance of probabilities standard does not do this because presumption of innocence doesn害羞草研究所檛 apply to correctional centre disciplinary hearings.

It argued that the rationale for presumption of innocence is to guard against wrongful convictions and submitted that this consideration is unique to criminal law but does not apply to inmate discipline, the judge noted.

The trial is set for Feb. 12.

害羞草研究所淚 conclude it is not plain and obvious that the plaintiffs害羞草研究所� claim is bound to fail. Accordingly, I decline to strike this claim,害羞草研究所� Douglas decided.

Douglas also noted in her reasons that Trotchie has been imprisoned in several BC Corrections害羞草研究所� institutions and has 害羞草研究所渟ignificant experience with the Province害羞草研究所檚 prison disciplinary regime.害羞草研究所�