害羞草研究所

Skip to content

Vancouver Island man who tried to sue for $32 trillion unsuccessful in his appeal

B.C. Court of Appeal hearing cut short after 害羞草研究所榩rofanity-laden outbursts害羞草研究所
25896606_web1_210721-NBU-32-trillion-appeal-1_1
Court of Appeal in Vancouver. (Tom Zytaruk/Black Press file)

A Nanaimo man who had a $32-trillion lawsuit thrown out of court earlier this year was unsuccessful in trying to appeal that decision.

Tyler Chamberlin, who filed a civil claim against ICBC in 2020 after he was struck by a vehicle while riding his bike in a hit-and-run in 2018, had his application to the B.C. Court of Appeal thrown out on Tuesday, July 20.

The hearing was July 5 in Vancouver, with the appellant and lawyers for seven respondents 害羞草研究所 ICBC, the Attorney General of B.C., the Attorney General of Canada, Island Health, the City of Nanaimo, the Chief Electoral Officer of B.C. and the College of Physicians and Surgeons of B.C. 害羞草研究所 participating via teleconference.

Justice Reginald Harris wrote in his judgment that the appellant, at the hearing, attempted 害羞草研究所渢o expand the scope of his appeals害羞草研究所 and when the judge tried to provide guidance, the appellant 害羞草研究所渋nterrupted me repeatedly with profanity-laden outbursts.害羞草研究所

Harris concluded it was unnecessary to hear from respondents and adjourned the hearing, giving the appellant a week to provide written submissions, which were received July 13.

The B.C. Court of Appeal judgment notes that Chamberlin did not articulate 害羞草研究所渁ny argument to suggest the judge made an error害羞草研究所 in the Supreme Court decision and instead attempted to raise 害羞草研究所渟ubstantive issues害羞草研究所 not subject to appeal.

The appellant asked that the court order Island Health to pay a $1-billion fine, B.C. Ferries a $1-million pay 害羞草研究所渇or denying Mr. Chamberlin access [and] obstructing justice,害羞草研究所 and require the Queen to 害羞草研究所渢ell the truth about COVID-19害羞草研究所 and Bible prophecy. The judge wrote that he would not dignify the appellant害羞草研究所檚 arguments by recounting them in detail.

害羞草研究所淢uch of it is abusive. Moreover, the argument contains overt threats 害羞草研究所 More importantly, the argument is entirely irrelevant to the issues on this appeal,害羞草研究所 the judge wrote. 害羞草研究所淭he argument is rooted in Mr. Chamberlin害羞草研究所檚 belief that in some way his motor vehicle accident was a result of a giant conspiracy, rooted in corruption throughout Canada.害羞草研究所

READ ALSO:

The B.C. Supreme Court judge, this past winter, had opted against a vexatious litigant order because of doubt that Chamberlin would be able to comply with new court filing standards.

The Appeal Court judge said Chamberlin will not be entitled to file further applications for appeal unless he is able to obtain an order allowing him an extension of time to file certain court documents.



editor@nanaimobulletin.com

Like us on and follow us on



About the Author: Nanaimo Bulletin News Staff

Read more



(or

害羞草研究所

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }