Bold new reforms have swept away 害羞草研究所渂ig money害羞草研究所� from local politics, restoring grassroots democracy for next fall害羞草研究所檚 province-wide elections for municipal councils, school boards and regional districts.
That害羞草研究所檚 what the B.C. NDP government wants you to believe, anyway, as their amendments to municipal and school board election laws take effect this week. Donations from corporations and unions are banned, and everyone is limited to a maximum $1,200 per year donation to any candidate or slate of candidates.
In terms of the direct writing of cheques from property developers and unions to their favourite candidates, this is certainly a welcome step. The B.C. Liberal government started in 2016 with spending limits, and the NDP has taken it to the next level.
The changes were made retroactive to Halloween, so big municipal machines like Vision Vancouver and Surrey First had one brief window to pile up donations for the 2018 election. We won害羞草研究所檛 know until after the 2018 vote how they did on that, but that problem applies mostly to the dozen or so cities where electoral organizations have been formed.
As with many things in B.C., there is an urban scene and an entirely separate reality for smaller communities, particularly those 害羞草研究所渂eyond Hope.害羞草研究所� NDP governments tend to develop rules that work for urban regions and show little understanding of the rest of B.C. The Agricultural Land Reserve is an example of this, and these local election changes are another.
The B.C. Liberals pushed to raise the individual contribution limit from $1,200 to $5,000, but that was defeated by the NDP-Green coalition. The opposition argued that most municipal candidates don害羞草研究所檛 even do fundraising, they simply finance their own campaigns, and $1,200 doesn害羞草研究所檛 go far for advertising in even a medium-sized community.
The NDP government isn害羞草研究所檛 going to force taxpayers to finance the campaigns of people they don害羞草研究所檛 support, as they are doing at the provincial level with a per-vote subsidy. They害羞草研究所檙e also not interested in extending tax credits to people who donate to local election campaigns.
Municipal Affairs Minister Selina Robinson gave a curt response to this when the changes were introduced in October. Local governments have never had any public subsidy or tax credit, so that害羞草研究所檚 why they don害羞草研究所檛 now.
The real reason is that federal and provincial political parties don害羞草研究所檛 want to share the small pool of citizens who are actually willing to donate to any politician. This becomes critically important with corporate and union donations prohibited at all levels.
Banning union donations isn害羞草研究所檛 as simple as it sounds. Take New Westminster (please). In their last election, the hard-left New Westminster and District Labour Council ran the table, with their endorsed candidates taking every spot on council and a majority on the school board.
This isn害羞草研究所檛 a slate, as such. It害羞草研究所檚 the municipal staff, school board staff and teacher union locals picking who they would like to negotiate their next contract with. Given the low turnout of municipal elections and even lower public interest in school boards, it害羞草研究所檚 often enough. And since government only grows at every level in Canada, it害羞草研究所檚 getting stronger.
Coupled with provincial unions not only financing union-friendly candidates, but giving paid leave or vacation to employees to work on phone banks and voter databases, this is the biggest conflict of interest in B.C. politics today.
Robinson insists that unions and other groups can害羞草研究所檛 do surveys or canvass voters and share the results with a candidate, unless they register with Elections B.C. and declare these expenditures. We害羞草研究所檒l see how that works next fall.
Tom Fletcher is B.C. legislature reporter and columnist for Black Press. Email: tfletcher@blackpress.ca
tfletcher@blackpress.ca
Like us on and follow us on .
