Not too long ago, some friends received rather odd messages from me. The messages, through Messenger, had my name attached and used the same profile picture I used for my personal Facebook account.
Those who replied to the initial greeting and asked about me received the reply, 害羞草研究所淒oing good but bored with this pandemic, though. Just finished my second vaccination a few days ago.害羞草研究所� Those who responded to that comment received a link to a site where they could apply to receive money.
The account was a fake and those who know me should have been able to tell almost immediately.
To begin, I wouldn害羞草研究所檛 say I害羞草研究所檓 害羞草研究所渂ored with this pandemic.害羞草研究所� For the last 15 months, I害羞草研究所檝e seen the COVID-19 pandemic as a time of new challenges and unique opportunities, and while it hasn害羞草研究所檛 always been easy, I害羞草研究所檓 certainly not bored.
READ ALSO:
READ ALSO:
Little grammatical mistakes and typos 害羞草研究所� misplaced commas, missing capitalization and sentences without periods 害羞草研究所� were another clue the comments were not mine.
Multiple friends contacted me and reported the message to Facebook and Instagram as coming from a fake account.
This isn害羞草研究所檛 the first time someone has sent messages from an account claiming to be me.
Usually, imposter accounts are taken down within minutes. This one took longer. I was in contact with Instagram at least six times before it was removed.
Later, I was left thinking about what had happened.
Someone had chosen to use my name and my reputation to make statements I would not have made and to promote something I would not endorse. This happens too often, to too many people.
For instance, a few years ago, a poem about brand names, attributed to African-American poet Maya Angelou, was circulating online. But the language and tone in the poem were nothing at all like Angelou害羞草研究所檚 writings.
A sweet, sentimental essay, The Paradox of Our Times, has been attributed to counterculture comedian George Carlin. But Carlin, known for his 1972 monologue, Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television, didn害羞草研究所檛 write this piece.
害羞草研究所淚t害羞草研究所檚 not only bad prose and poetry, it害羞草研究所檚 weak philosophy. I hope I never sound like that,害羞草研究所� he wrote in response. The essay was in fact penned by Bob Moorehouse, a former pastor in Seattle.
The essay didn害羞草研究所檛 sound like Carlin. The use of language and the message were both unlike anything he had written or said before. Was this a simple case of an error in attribution, or was it an example of using Carlin害羞草研究所檚 name and reputation to promote this piece? Either way, the work was not Carlin害羞草研究所檚.
害羞草研究所淚 want people to know that I take care with my writing, and try to keep my standards high,害羞草研究所� Carlin once said in response to The Paradox of Our Times.
There are also cases where a fabricated statement 害羞草研究所� not simply a wrongly attributed quote 害羞草研究所� is used to discredit or embarrass a person or organization. And there are times when someone害羞草研究所檚 name is used to shill a product or service.
This is what happened with the imposter who sent messages under my name. In each of these cases, something about the quotation or statement didn害羞草研究所檛 sound right. That should have been enough to prompt readers to do a bit of research.
That profound quote or inspirational essay might not have come from the person whose name is attached to it. And that puzzling text message may have come from an imposter rather than a friend.
John Arendt is the editor of the Summerland Review.
To report a typo, email:
news@summerlandreview.com.
news@summerlandreview.com
Like us on and follow us on .
