My previous three columns might suggest otherwise, but cell phones are not the boogieman.
One of my 害羞草研究所渇ans害羞草研究所� posted an online comment accusing me of being 害羞草研究所満π卟菅芯克on a one man crusade to eradicate cell phone use害羞草研究所π卟菅芯克鶟. I would have taken that as a compliment if not followed by: 害羞草研究所淗is constant diatribe is really getting boring if not annoying害羞草研究所π卟菅芯克鶟.
RELATED: Hergott: Cell phones vs. passengers
But while the eradication of cell phone use while driving is a battle I害羞草研究所檓 waging, it is not the war.
I害羞草研究所檒l pause a moment to openly recognize that I might be about as effective in this battle as the Black Knight in Monty Python and the Holy Grail! Please do yourself the favour of searching 害羞草研究所淢onty Python Black Knight害羞草研究所� and watch the short scene.
The true boogieman was around long before cell phones, and has been building and building into the fire breathing monster it has become.
In my lifetime, I害羞草研究所檝e seen the near eradication of the standard transmission and the addition of such conveniences as cruise control and automatic dual zoned climate control. Automobiles have evolved to require less and less 害羞草研究所渨ork害羞草研究所� to operate. And, correspondingly, less and less direct cognitive attention.
Road safety resources have been put into making our roads safer. Put another way, our roads have become more and more idiot proof.
RELATED: How kids perceive using cell-phones while driving
Take notice of the idiot proofing next time you害羞草研究所檙e out on the road.
Speed signs are not enough; we害羞草研究所檝e added warning signs that the speed is about to change. Yellow lights are not enough; we害羞草研究所檝e added advance flashing yellow lights.
Many intersections have been made much safer with the addition of advance left turn signals. Were they installed to protect against attentive drivers? No, to protect against the 害羞草研究所渋diot害羞草研究所� inattentive ones.
You will notice example after example. The more we idiot proof the roadways, the less direct and constant attention we need to navigate them.
And then there害羞草研究所檚 all the safety mechanisms, both in automobiles as well as on roadways. Seatbelts, air bags and crumple zones, coupled with the likes of guard rails and centre road dividers, lull drivers into the perception that it is as if we are in an amusement park bumper car ride.
The lower the perceived consequences of a crash, the less white knuckled (attentive) we become. In a column a year and a half ago I suggested that seatbelts have been one of the biggest failures in road safety history. To illustrate my point, imagine how a law banning seatbelts might impact your level of attention behind the wheel.
All of that has contributed to the reality that fully 50 per cent of the injury cases I handle are caused by rear-ender crashes where one vehicle comes to a complete stop and the following vehicle simply drives into the back of that stopped vehicle.
Inattention is the boogieman. And looking back, we created the 害羞草研究所減erfect storm害羞草研究所� of factors to bring it about.
We could choose to put road safety resources into hunting the boogieman down and slaying it. Like we害羞草研究所檝e worked hard to do with impaired driving.
We could implement a well funded campaign educating drivers that constant attention is required behind the wheel. That it害羞草研究所檚 not enough to stay within the lines, within the speed limit, and unimpaired by alcohol and drugs. That it害羞草研究所檚 not enough to keep your eyes on the road ahead of you.
The science is clear that looking out of the windshield, if your brain is elsewhere, will result in you 害羞草研究所渕issing害羞草研究所� up to 50 per cent of what is there to be seen. That害羞草研究所檚 what causes all those entirely preventable rear-enders.
But we害羞草研究所檙e not. We害羞草研究所檙e doing the opposite. We are implementing more road 害羞草研究所渟afety害羞草研究所� policies that feed and nurture the boogieman.
RELATED: Targeting driver害羞草研究所檚 attitudes
The worst being our law banning hand held cell phone use.
It害羞草研究所檚 bad enough to target 害羞草研究所渆yes off the road害羞草研究所� and 害羞草研究所渉ands off the wheel害羞草研究所� while leaving the boogieman alone.
But this law serves up a big, juicy steak to the boogieman by saying: 害羞草研究所淚t害羞草研究所檚 safe to engage in the distracting behaviour of a cell phone discussion or voice to text as long as you don害羞草研究所檛 use your hands.害羞草研究所�
Crash statistics, that were on a decline, have increased since that idiotic law. We would have been better without it. But even better would be sending the loud and clear message that the only activity you should be doing when behind the wheel is driving.
Like us on and follow us on .
