To the editor:

I must respond to the letter you published from D. Campbell, last Friday. In it, she claims about those who are 害羞草研究所減ro-life害羞草研究所� [that] they are no more 害羞草研究所減ro-life害羞草研究所� than those of us who call ourselves 害羞草研究所減ro-choice.害羞草研究所�

Well, as a matter of fact Ms. Campbell, those who are pro-life are in favor of life by definition, as opposed to those who claim to be 害羞草研究所減ro-choice,害羞草研究所� one choice of which is to end a life. Another fallacy in your argument is where you wrote 害羞草研究所満π卟菅芯克��attempting to influence laws that impact the very decisions women can be permitted to make regarding their own bodies.害羞草研究所�

I don害羞草研究所檛 think that too many of us want to change your ability or right to make decisions regarding you own body, including killing yourself if you so desire, but we do want to stop you from killing another human being, which is what that baby is.

Yes, I am pro-life, which makes me an anti-ahotionist, and I am glad that yout mother was pro-life also.

Ed Copeman

Kelowna