So let it be written害羞草研究所�

Do you remember that episode of Seinfeld where Kramer gets mobbed because he refuses to wear 害羞草研究所渢he ribbon?害羞草研究所�

He害羞草研究所檚 participating in an AIDS walk, but refuses to wear a red AIDS ribbon in defiance of 害羞草研究所渞ibbon bullies害羞草研究所� who insist that he do so. He害羞草研究所檚 told he 害羞草研究所渉as to,害羞草研究所� to which he replies, 害羞草研究所淪ee, that害羞草研究所檚 why I don害羞草研究所檛 want to.害羞草研究所�

Kramer害羞草研究所檚 decision is not well-received. During the walk, he gets called out by the crowd. 害羞草研究所淲ho?! Who doesn害羞草研究所檛 want to wear the ribbon?害羞草研究所� a furious participant demands. In the end, Kramer tries to scramble up a fire ladder to escape, but an angry mob yanks him down.

Sound familiar? It can serve as a metaphor for the tyranny we witness on social media, daily and even hourly. Demonize and dog-pile, demonize and dog-pile. If you disagree with me, you are not only wrong, you are evil. The enemy.

As Frank Zappa said, 害羞草研究所淭here is more stupidity than hydrogen in the universe, and it has a longer shelf life.害羞草研究所�

That Seinfeld episode first aired on Dec. 7, 1995. Man, we have slid a long way down the garbage chute since then.

Don害羞草研究所檛 get me wrong, bonafide bad guys should get their comeuppance and social media can play a justified role in this. But so many people, decent ones among them, can find themselves in Kramer害羞草研究所檚 shoes these days, targeted for social or even financial mayhem for not obsequiously toeing this or that line or cause. Tried, drawn and quartered in the kangaroo courts of Facebook and Twitter.

People who simply have an opinion to express can fall victim to scorched-earth attacks launched by galactically uptight numbskulls who are either mortally challenged by their target害羞草研究所檚 philosophical leanings, real or perceived, or virulently outraged by any hesitation to embrace with reverence their personal views as sacrosanct, as the only acceptable one true path.

The result is people operating on guard, and sincerity, freedom of association, and expression of ideas suffer in the process.

These days anyone can be a target on social media, at any time, for what they say, where they go, who they see, or even none of the above. No second chances. Some people smell blood and see opportunity. All it takes is an unhinged hysterical personality armed with a smartphone and social media account to ruin one害羞草研究所檚 day, or worse, if their online campaign generates enough bandwagon tribalism and condemnation to bring real pressure to bear.

To the self-righteous and self-centred among us who wield social media as their own personal boom-stick, principles like tolerance, forbearance, magnanimity and even mercy are antiquated unless applied directly and liberally to themselves, and even then the application is mistaken as justice.

The tribalism and toxicity that thrives on social media is not only worrisome, it represents a genuine threat to individual liberty as long as enough people eagerly jump on attack bandwagons without paying due tribute to the golden rule.

Consider the wisdom of Victorian novelist George Eliot, who said 害羞草研究所淭he responsibility of tolerance lies with those who have the wider vision.害羞草研究所�

This quote, too, can be found on the Internet. Its practice, not so much.

So let it be done.