Donald Trump is 害羞草研究所渋nnocent害羞草研究所� and did not break the law, a lawyer for the former president told jurors during closing arguments Tuesday as the landmark moved closer to its conclusion.

The arguments, expected to last the entire day, will give attorneys one last chance to address the Manhattan jury and to score final points with the panel the fate of the first former American president to be charged with felony crimes.

害羞草研究所淧resident Trump is innocent. He did not commit any crimes, and the district attorney has not met their burden of proof. Period,害羞草研究所� said defense attorney Todd Blanche, who said the evidence in the case should 害羞草研究所渓eave you wanting.害羞草研究所�

, the summations tee up a momentous and historically unprecedented task for the jury as it decides whether to convict the presumptive Republican presidential nominee in connection with to prevent a porn actor from going public with her claims of a sexual encounter with Trump.

Because prosecutors have the burden of proof in the case, they will deliver their arguments last.

Prosecutors will tell jurors that they have heard enough testimony to convict Trump of all charges while defense attorneys will aim to create doubts about the strength of the evidence by targeting the credibility of , Trump害羞草研究所檚 former lawyer and personal fixer for his role in the hush money payments and who served as the star prosecution witness in the trial.

After closing arguments are given, the judge will instruct the jury, likely Wednesday, on the law governing the case and the factors the panel can take into account during deliberations. The deliberations will then proceed in secret, though some clues as to the jury害羞草研究所檚 thinking may arrive through any notes it sends to the judge with questions.

Trump faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, charges punishable by up to four years in prison. He has pleaded not guilty and denied any wrongdoing. It害羞草研究所檚 unclear whether prosecutors would seek imprisonment in the event of a conviction, or if the judge would impose that punishment if asked.

The case centers on a $130,000 payment Cohen made to in the final days of the 2016 election to prevent her from going public with her story of a sexual encounter she says she had with Trump 10 years earlier in a Lake Tahoe hotel suite. , and his attorney, during hours of questioning in the trial, accused her of making it up.

When Trump reimbursed Cohen, the payments were logged as being for legal services, which prosecutors say was designed to conceal the true purpose of the transaction with Daniels and to illegally interfere in the 2016 election, in which Trump defeated Democrat Hillary Clinton.

Trump害羞草研究所檚 lawyers contend they were legitimate payments for actual legal services, and they say that his celebrity status, particularly during the campaign, made him , points they are expected to revisit during their closing arguments Tuesday.

The included Daniels, who described in sometimes vivid detail the encounter she says she had with Trump; , the former publisher of the National Enquirer, who testified that he used his media enterprise to protect Trump by squelching stories that could harm his campaign, including by paying $150,000 to a former Playboy model to keep her from going public with a claim that she had had a yearlong affair with Trump; and Cohen, who testified that Trump was intimately involved in the hush money discussions 害羞草研究所� 害羞草研究所淛ust pay it,害羞草研究所� the now-disbarred lawyer quoted Trump as saying.

Prosecutors are expected to remind jurors of the bank statements, emails and other documentary evidence they have viewed, as well as an audio recording in which Cohen and Trump can be heard discussing the deal involving the Playboy model, Karen McDougal. Trump has denied a relationship with McDougal too.

Defense lawyers called two witnesses 害羞草研究所� neither of them Trump. They focused much of their energy on discrediting Cohen, pressing him on his own criminal history, his past lies and .

On cross-examination, for instance, Cohen admitted stealing tens of thousands of dollars from Trump害羞草研究所檚 company by asking to be reimbursed for money he had not spent. Cohen acknowledged once telling a prosecutor he felt that Daniels and her lawyer were extorting Trump.

Though jurors witnessed numerous memorable moments, they won害羞草研究所檛 be told during closing arguments about exchanges and rulings that occurred outside their presence 害羞草研究所� . Judge Juan M. Merchan, for instance, fined Trump $10,000 for violating a gag order barring incendiary out-of-court comments and threatened to jail him if it continued.

The New York prosecution is one of four pending against Trump as he seeks to reclaim the White House from Democrat Joe Biden.

The three other state and federal cases center on charges of illegally hoarding classified documents at his estate in Palm Beach, Florida, and conspiring to overturn the 2020 presidential election. But it害羞草研究所檚 unclear that any of them will reach trial before the November election.

READ ALSO: