I害羞草研究所檓 not a 害羞草研究所減erfect physical specimen.害羞草研究所�
If you know me, you are likely rolling your eyes and muttering: 害羞草研究所淩eally? You don害羞草研究所檛 say!害羞草研究所�
Not a perfect psychological specimen either.
害羞草研究所淣o sh** Sherlock!害羞草研究所�
I害羞草研究所檓 functioning really well, though.
After over 20 years in the legal profession I害羞草研究所檓 trying to cut back on office hours, but can still put in a 14 hour day.
And over 30 years since learning to drink in the Canadian Military, I害羞草研究所檓 trying to cut that back as well, but for the most part I live my life without hangovers.
If assessed by a medical specialist, her opinion would be along the lines of Newton害羞草研究所檚 first law of motion, i.e. 害羞草研究所満π卟菅芯克An object in motion stays in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.害羞草研究所�
In other words, I害羞草研究所檓 likely to continue functioning well unless something significant occurs.
Tomorrow I am sitting at a complete stop at a red light. A driver is chatting away by cell phone, using perfectly legal (though perfectly dangerous) hands free technology. Distracted, he crashes into the back of my car.
I害羞草研究所檓 fine, at the scene. No broken bones. It takes time for the sprained/strained tissues in my neck and back to become inflamed and painful.
The next morning I can hardly get out of bed.
I participate fully in whatever care is recommended, but never fully recover. I am left with chronic lower back and neck symptoms.
I 害羞草研究所渟elf-medicate害羞草研究所� with alcohol to the point that I害羞草研究所檓 waking with a hangover more often than not. And I have become depressed.
An ICBC appointed medical specialist conducts an 害羞草研究所渋ndependent害羞草研究所� medical examination.
The specialist reports, accurately, that had I been in better physical shape it is unlikely that I would have developed chronic pain. If better psychological shape, I would not have become a dysfunctional user of alcohol, nor would I have become depressed.
Had I been a perfectly well adjusted 19-year-old gymnast who had never touched a drop of alcohol, I likely would have made a complete recovery.
ICBC blames my relatively deconditioned 47-year-old body and psychologically imperfections for the chronic pain and depression.
Because absent those attributes, I would have enjoyed a complete recovery.
Is that fair?
Absent the crash, I wouldn害羞草研究所檛 have been injured in the first place!
Absent the crash, my 47-year-old, psychologically imperfect self would have 害羞草研究所満π卟菅芯克stayed in motion with the same speed and in the same direction害羞草研究所π卟菅芯克鶟
How does the law wrestle with this situation?
This is the simplest, but worst understood principle of personal injury law.
The legal principle is that 害羞草研究所淵ou take your victim as you find him.害羞草研究所�
Crash into the back of a car occupied by a 19-year-old, psychologically perfect gymnast whose injuries 100 per cent completely resolve, then lucky you. Your liability insurance company, ICBC, will have to pay only a small amount of financial compensation on your behalf for the small amount of damage you caused.
Crash into the back of a 47-year-old, physically and psychologically imperfect lawyer who ends up developing chronic pain and depression, the law makes you 100 per cent responsible for all of those consequences.
While a common negotiating tactic, 害羞草研究所渂laming the victim害羞草研究所� doesn害羞草研究所檛 hold water in our legal system, at least not on this point.
And please, please remember that very few road users are perfectly adjusted, 19-year-old gymnasts. Pay your full attention to the road ahead of you and stay off your damned phone.
